Head to head

EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro vs BLUETTI AC70

BLUETTI AC70 has the higher continuous output (1,000 W).

EcoFlow RIVER 2 ProBLUETTI AC70
Capacity768 Wh768 Wh
Usable at 85%653 Wh653 Wh
Continuous output800 W1,000 W
Motor surge usedNot applied to motors1,500 W
Resistive boostX-Boost 1,600 WPower Lifting 2,000 W
ChemistryLiFePO4LiFePO4
Cycle life3,000 to 80%+3,000 to 80%
Weight17.2 lb22.5 lb
Dimensions10.6 × 10.2 × 8.912.4 × 8.2 × 10.1
Outlets4 AC outlets, 800 W shared, plus USB-A, USB-C (100 W), and 12.6 V DC ports.2× 120 V AC, 1,000 W shared. 2 USB-C at 100 W, 2 USB-A, and a 12 V car outlet.
Launch priceNot verifiedNot verified
SourceManufacturer pageManufacturer page

Check a current price

These buttons are placeholders. A real affiliate URL, when one exists, is read from links.json.

Check priceOpens the manufacturer page. No affiliate link is set in links.json.

Check priceOpens the manufacturer page. No affiliate link is set in links.json.

Questions

How do the EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro and the BLUETTI AC70 compare?

BLUETTI AC70 has the higher continuous output (1,000 W).

Which one runs longer?

EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro has 653 Wh usable in Willrun's math (768 Wh × 0.85). BLUETTI AC70 has 653 Wh usable. Runtime still depends on the appliance's average draw.

Can cycle life be ranked between them?

The cycle quotes do not share a published endpoint, or one of them is missing. Willrun does not rank 70% retention against 80% retention.

Where do the numbers come from?

Product spec: 768 Wh, pure sine wave, 800 W total (surge 1,600 W). Comparison table lists the same 1,600 W as X-Boost, 4 AC outlets, and 17.2 lb. Treated as resistive boost, not motor-start capacity. Spec table: 768 Wh, 1,000 W total, surge 1,500 W, about 22.5 lb, LiFePO4, 3,000+ cycles to 80%. Power Lifting to 2,000 W is described for heating devices. The FAQ says not to run an air conditioner or washing machine on lifting mode. A shelf price on the page was not recorded as a launch price.

EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro page · BLUETTI AC70 page